Going forward… and other mumbo jumbo
Guess the occupation of the person who said this: “It set the platform going forward for the remainder of the…”
No, it wasn’t our PM, any other politician, or some corporate bod. It was a footy player, covered in mud and sweat and gasping for air.
Clearly mumbo-jumbo is catching. What’s wrong with saying: “It set us up for the rest of the game”? You’ve got to worry when weasel words hit the footy field.
So leave platforms for bus and train stations, or for standing on to clean the windows of multi-storey buildings (among other things). Use remainders when you’re talking about left over stuff you’re selling off cheaply (or other valid uses).
And for the love of … language (and sanity), forget any phrase involving going forward. For a start, it’s superfluous because it’s clear you’re not talking about going backward. It’s also perfectly fine to talk about the future. Even if the Mayan Calendar runs out next year, most of us are confident we have a ‘future’, so it’s okay to mention the f-word. Or am I just an eternal optimist?
Ditto for forward planning, unless you usually backward plan and you need to make the difference clear.
Let’s all relax – mean what we say, say what we mean, and lose the mumbo-jumbo. Because simple language doesn’t mean you are simple. It means you’re quite clever actually.
It also means people’s eyes won’t glaze over before they work out whether you’re talking about the footy game or fiscal policy.
Dropping the Oxford comma
According to this GalleyCat blog post, the Oxford comma has been officially dropped by Oxford University. I’ve used it for years, argued its case with unbelievers, and now it’s been read its last rites.
But what is this comma so many people have never heard of, and certainly won’t mourn? It’s the comma that takes the confusion out of lists within a sentence.
GalleyCat quotes the Oxford PR style guide to explain: “‘As a general rule, …write ‘a, b and c’ not ‘a, b, and c’. But when a comma would assist in the meaning of the sentence or helps to resolve ambiguity, it can be used – especially where one of the items in the list is already joined by ‘and’ [for example]: They had a choice between croissants, bacon and eggs, and muesli.’”
Personally, I like the Oxford comma. But its loss is part of our evolving language, and it does eliminate the need to explain that part of my editing process. So it can’t be all bad…can it?
The Upside of Failure
Most of us learned our lessons well as children. Failure = bad, useless, stupid. The clear pathway to success was NOT to fail.
We learned to fear failure, to avoid failure at all costs – and even to deny that we’d failed, by blaming someone or something outside of ourselves.
But some of the world’s greatest success stories were built on failure.
Stephen King threw his Carrie manuscript away because he was tired of being rejected. Luckily his wife fished it out of the garbage bin.
Henry Ford, who crashed out many times before tasting success, said: “Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, only this time more intelligently”.
Richard Branson is no stranger to failure either. He believes being unafraid of failure is one of the most important qualities of a champion – in any field.
So you’ve challenged yourself, and fallen short? Here’s the upside of failure:
- You had the guts to try
- You’ll know that burying your head in the sand just gets your butt kicked (well, it’s a clear target, isn’t it?)
- You won’t wait around for a miracle
- You’ll recognise your mistakes and find ways to recover from them
- You’ll hire good help, and collaborate with people you trust
- You’ll be more determined to succeed next time – in fact, next time you’ll plan to succeed
- You’ll begin to lose your fear of failure – because you WILL survive, no matter how bad it feels at the time
- You’ll find out that you’re stronger than you ever imagined
- And you’ll keep aiming higher, because you’ll get a taste for rising to challenges.
A Newsweek photo series caption puts it best: “If at first you don’t succeed… you’re in good company.”
Finally, from my most favourite speech by Theodore Roosevelt in 1910: If you fail, at least you will fail “while daring greatly. So that your place will never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory, nor defeat”.
So if you haven’t challenged yourself lately, be inspired. Dare to fail.
Stop press! New dragonfly website takes off
I’m very excited to (at last) be launching our new-look dragonfly website. I’d love you to visit and let me know what you think. http://dragonflyink.com.au.
It’s an interesting exercise to completely change the look and feel of a website you’re happy with. I made the choice because I wanted content management capability, and there were also technical issues messing with my SEO (search engine optimisation).
But I’ve had it parked for a whole year while I’ve been flat out with work – and, I’ll admit, procrastinating (just a bit). I’ve finally put it out there and I feel so much better – and not just because it was one more thing ticked off my to-do list.
It’s a bit like buying a new car. You loved the old one, but the new one just goes better.
So I’m well aware of how daunting it is to create a brand new website or update an old one – no matter what size organisation you are. It’s something that ends up in the too-hard basket. It sits on our to-do list, sticking its tongue out at us, daring us to ‘just do it’.
My advice to you is if you need help, get it. With the words, the structure, the SEO, getting the URL, the right service provider. Most importantly, decide who your audience is and why they’re coming to your website – and give them what they want.
Not only will you feel better about getting it done – but you’ll reap the benefits of an effective business tool. Trust me, you’ll wonder why you kept putting it off…
What does your communication style say about you?
I was working with a new client the other day, and I have to say, it was a delight. This client had a very strong sense of who he was and what his business was about. And he wanted his written communication to reflect that.
He had the vital ingredient when it comes to communication style: authenticity.
So instead of creating a hazy document, muddied with corporate-speak, we were able to put together a clear, simple document that said what he wanted to say and in a way he would say it himself.
He was willing to take a risk, be a little different – be real. I call it a WYSIWYG approach. What You See Is What You Get.
The term is used to describe computing systems that display the text as it will appear in the final output, rather than in code (e.g. HTML).
I use it to describe a piece of writing that clearly conveys the ‘personality’ or ‘voice’ of the person or organisation it is about – no secret codes, no BS. You know what you’re getting.
That’s authentic – and it’s good for business. Your clients and customers can feel comfortable knowing that you mean what you say – and the language and style you use is consistent with who you are. It inspires confidence.
Does the style or ‘voice’ of your content – in websites, reports, and marketing material – reflect who you and your organisation really are? Is your communication authentic?
This is the second in our series of posts about branding. You might also like to read: Is the ‘face’ of your business sending the right message?
Is the ‘face’ of your business looking good?
The other day, I dropped into a local cupcake shop on the way to a concept development meeting (because eating cupcakes while getting creative is pretty nice really).
One of my dragonflies was with me, and we approached the counter and greeted the sales girl.
Blank stare. ‘Yes?’
We did a double-take but proceeded to choose our cupcakes – which took all of 30 seconds (okay, maybe 40) – while she stood there with her eyes rolled to the ceiling… Clearly we were taking up her valuable time.
When we made our choices, she put them in the box, dumped it on the counter, snapped out the amount, and took my money. She handed back the change, again without a word, and we both stood there gobsmacked. I wanted to say, ‘I’ve changed my mind. I don’t want the cupcakes anymore’. But I didn’t.
Instead, we both walked out of that cupcake shop with a bad taste in our mouths. I wonder if the business owner realises how much custom the ‘face of his business’ is turning away?
I’m sure you’ve got your own stories to tell, including great experiences you could talk about.
Talk and tell are the key words here. Because that’s what we do – about the good, the bad, the ugly customer service.
And that brings me to branding. Businesses will pay a lot of money to build brand recognition, while the human ‘face’ of their business may be undoing all that good work.
Why? Because customers talk, and word of mouth is the best, most cost-effective, and most powerful marketing tool you have at your disposal.
What does the face of your business look like? Are your people’s attitudes consistent with your branding efforts? Do customers get the experience they expect from you – every time?
Customer service expectations need to be clearly communicated. It’s not enough to expect your employees to know how to act, or to know that the way they behave is an important factor in your business’s success (and therefore their jobs…).
It’s vital to regularly evaluate performance too, and to recognise and reward good performance.
Think about cupcakes. No matter how great those cupcakes are, we won’t be going there again. Which is good for our waistline – but not good for their bottom line.
Is it time to look at the face of your business?
Shorter working hours: good for us, good for business
Think about your average day at work. How productive are you…really? How much fully-focused project work do you get done daily? How much overtime do you clock up in a week, a month, a year?
According to an article in the Courier Mail last weekend (Price to pay for overwork, Careers, p5), Australians clock up some of the longest working hours in the developed world. And it’s affecting our stress levels and our productivity!
If you’ve ever had the joy of working undisturbed for any length of time, you’ll know that 5-6 hours productive working time is as good as it gets. Sure, we can put in 10 hour days, but are we really producing our best work or great outcomes? Apparently not – and we’re not doing ourselves (or our bosses) any favours either.
Should Australians adopt shorter working hours? Would we get more done? Would we be more productive? I’m sure we would. After all, we’d have more time to spend with friends and family, more time to exercise, and more time to chill out and regroup. Surely we’d come back the next day more refreshed – and ready to get stuck into our jobs again?
It may also improve our mindpower…
Sounds to me like shorter working hours are good for us… and good for business.
cheers
Louise
Leave a Comment

